Self-Powered Transformer - Free Energy Generator of André Coutier

Self-Generating Perpetual Electrical Energy - Self-powered Generator of André Coutier

The apparatus is composed of a closed magnetic circuit (fig. 1) consisted 1 soft iron core, affecting the shape of a cylinder of section S; NR cores satellite, of section parallels to the core and laid out circularly around this core; 2N radial branches, of section S/N connecting the NR satellite cores to the core.
The Self-powered Generator of André Coutier

The core carries inductive winding comprising the number of whorls necessary to obtain, with a primary current of intensity given, the saturation of the magnetic circuit.

Each satellite core carries a winding comprising the same number of whorls as that of the core.

Being given the specific measure of the magnetic circuit, each one of the NR groups formed by the core and any of the NR satellites constitutes alone a transformer. The current induced in each one of the NR satellite windings has even power that the inductive central current.

Thus constituted, the apparatus carries out the multiplication of electrical energy. Energy collected being higher than initial creative energy, one immediately conceives the possibility of taking indefinitely, on energy collected, the power necessary to the perpetual reconstitution of initial energy.

Figure 2 schematically indicates the device used to carry out the industrial model of self-generating perpetual of electrical energy, models established for its employment in industry, sea and river transport, traction on railways.

Three multiplying apparatuses (the number of these apparatuses can be unspecified) are combined in series, in such way that the circuit of the core E of any of the apparatuses, is supplied by the current resulting from the satellite circuits F, combined in derivation, of the apparatus which precedes it. The satellite circuits of 1 combined in derivation feed the central circuit of 2. In the same way, the satellite circuits of 2 feed 3 exchange.

Each apparatus comprising 6 satellites (the number of the satellite cores can be unspecified) the factor of amplification for each apparatus is 6, that is to say for the 6^ unit 3 = 216.

It is then easy, using a derivation and rheostat H, to take on the final current, energy necessary to the reconstitution of the initial current.

Engine I with alternative course, actuates the dynamo J, assembled on the same tree. The D.C. current from the dynamo J, actuates the transformer trembler K (report/ratio 1/1).

The alternative course, resulting from the transfor mator K, reconstitutes the current initiated feeding the circuit of the core E of the first multiplier.

The device includes/understands moreover 2 accumulator batteries intended to counter any possibility.

One of the batteries, L is on standby whereas the battery m is in load.

In the event of accidental stopping of the dynamo J the electro one of circuit breaker N is de-energized and its reinforcement comes to complete, of the battery L which enters immediately in action, it is the same the electro one of the circuit breaker O whose reinforcement comes to put at the mass the exit of the primary education of the transformer K.

Moreover it is always possible, using the switch p intercalated following resistance Q in the circuit of excitaion of éiectro N to cause the setting in motion of the battery in position of waiting (battery 1 of the fig. 2).

The battery m is in load and the flow of the charging current is regulated by the r. La rheostat put in load of a battery effec is killed by the operation out of the switch S. the startup (position of waiting) out of a battery is carried out using the COM mutateur T.

The entry in action of the battery in position of waiting is: announced by ringing N.

Figure 3 indicates the simplified device schematically, for its application to the domestic uses, the aerial navigation, the traction of the motor vehicles.

- In this model, the engine with alternative course, the dynamo and the accumulators are removed. The setting goes from there is carried out with arid magneto v, with D.C. current, which actuates the transformer K whose alternate neck rant feeds the central circuit E.

The catch of the current is carried out on only one wire and the circuit being closed with the mass is traversed by a rectified current whose undulations are deadened by filter Z formed by two magnets coupled by two condensers.

Note: Some twelve years after Hubbard’s public demonstration, on 12th January 1933, André Coutier was awarded patent FR739458 which is entitled Self-generating Electrical Generator. This design is so similar to the Hubbard device that it seems very likely that it IS the Hubbard device under a different name.

Hubbard Coil - Self-Powered Transformer - Free Energy

Description of André Coutier Self-powered Generator

The apparatus is composed of a closed magnetic circuit (Fig.1)


consisting of one soft iron central core coil, surrounded by a number of smaller diameter soft-iron cored coils. While the diagram shows six coils, that is not a fixed number. The smaller diameter coils have the same number of wire turns wound around them and so each of those small coils produces the same current as that which flows in the coil wound around the large inner coil. The cross-sectional core areas of the satellite coils is set to be the same as the cross-sectional area of the central coil core.

The overall design is very simple as shown here:


According to the patent, each of the surrounding coils has an output current equal to that of the central coil. So, if a current of say, 1 amp, is fed to the central coil, then each of the six surrounding coils will have an output current of 1 amp. As the six output coils are wired in parallel, the output current should be 6 amps, giving a COP value of 6 or if you prefer, an electrical efficiency of 600%.

No system is 100% efficient as there are some losses from the wire resistance, the heating of the wire, eddy currents flowing sideways in the iron cores, etc. in each coil. So, the overall efficiency will be less than 600% but the overall energy gain will still be substantial. The voltage remains essentially unchanged but please remember that as the current increases, so must the wire diameter in order to carry that increased current.

Coutier uses three of these coil sets as part of his arrangement and he then takes off a controlled amount from the output to provide the needed input for the system:

The output is alternating current. Coutier chooses to use an isolating transformer in his feedback control which feeds the necessary input current to his oscillator circuit. He also uses a mechanical vibrator as his oscillator as way back in 1933 there were no readily available semiconductors. His overall circuit diagram uses infinity symbols to indicate Alternating Current and it looks like this:


An attempted translation of the patent text is:

The device consists of a closed magnetic circuit (fig. 1) consisting of one central core of soft iron, in the shape of a cylinder. There are N similar satellite cores, set parallel to the central core and placed in a circle around the central core. The central core is an inductive coil with the number of turns required to achieve saturation of the magnetic circuit with the chosen inductive current. Each of the satellites coils has the same number of turns as there are in the central core coil.

Given the particular provision of the magnetic circuit, each of the satellite coils is an isolated transformer and so the current induced in each of the satellite windings has the same power as the central coil current. Thus, the unit produces a multiplication of electrical energy. As the output energy exceeds the initial input energy, we see immediately the opportunity to use some of the output energy to provide the necessary input energy on a continuous basis.

The device used for the industrial model of the perpetual self-powered electricity generator, established for use in industry, maritime and river navigation, and traction on railways, is shown schematically in Fig.2.

Three multiplier devices (there can be any number of these devices) are combined in series, so that the core e of one circuit is powered by electricity from the combined satellite circuits f, of the previous device. The satellite coils of set 1 feed the central coil of set 2. Similarly, the set 2 satellite circuits feed the central coil of set 3.

Each unit with 6 satellites (there can be any number of satellites) determine the factor of power amplification of each set, and in this case it is 6. With the three coil sets shown, the power amplification is 6 x 6 x 6 = 216 times the input power.

It is easy, using an output power tap and the rheostat h, to provide the energy required as the input current. The coil i is magnetically linked to coil j, as they are mounted on the same core and they form a 1-to-1 ratio transformer. The output of coil j is used to operate a buzzer k whose AC coil output is used to feed the central coil e of the first power multiplier circuit.

The device also includes two batteries l and m - which are intended to deal with any eventuality. One battery can be charged while the other is available for use if there is an accidental stop of the generator.

Claims

Multiplication of electrical energy carried out by induction of satellite windings, grouped in a circle around an inductive central winding. The sum of the cross-sectional areas of the satellite cores is equal to the cross-sectional area of the central core. Self-generating perpetual electrical energy is achieved by taking energy from the last multiplier and using it to provide the input current.


This video claim it shows the bi-toroidal topology transformer, but in reality it show The André Coutier Transformer with one input coil in the middle and two satellite coils, to the left and right.

Since the suddenly passing of the free energy legend John Bedini, Shortly after he introduced the BEDINI RPX SIDEBAND GENERATOR I have decided to opensource all my ideas about the Coutier Coil. As you know the area of the center coil of the Coutier Coil is equal to the sum of the areas of the satellite coils. My idea is to do the opposite, making the center coil area, half of any satellite coils. The primary will act as an activation coil only and the energy in the Coutier coil will bounce between the satellite coils like the Thane C Heins bi-toroidal topology transformer.

Conclude

André Coutier's generators, Hubbard, belong to the Motionless Electricity Generator (MEG) group, operating in the Transformer mode. There are many generators similar to this model. What they have in common is that exploiting the "Back EMF" of a transformer in a disadvantageous form becomes beneficial.

Nikola Tesla once exploited the "Back EMF" of a generator to generate free energy. Tesla's scientific works are huge, but to simplify this problem, the Bifilar winding is the key to the problem of the Lenz force cancellation in the transformer (Back EMF). Lenz's force is actually the tension of the Ether when dynamic polarization occurs. This tension will be returned in itself - the secondary winding of the transformer - without affecting the primary winding of the transformer. So the power efficiency of the transformer will be over 100%. The method is as simple as that. For details on this, see: Floyd Sweet's Ether Field Transformer
 Revealed At Last: Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand

✔ Nikola Tesla’s method of magnifying electric power by neutralizing the magnetic counter-forces in an electric generator


✔ Combination of induction motor and alternator 
✔ Combine generators with induction motors - self-powered generators with rotary motion
✔ Various methods of generating high power immobile generators

✔ Or maybe called Overunity for the system. Mother Nature doesn't care about people calling or naming phenomena. Overunity or Free Energy, or Zero Point Energy (ZPE) are just a few different words


Post a Comment

  1. This is completely amazing and I have shared this to a group who will be very interested in the development of this World changing concept.
    With a bit of perseverance,I am sure this will be become the very needed change this planet has been waiting for!
    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would be a question. Let's go: From what I understand, the first generator provides 6 amps, the second 36 amps, the third 216 amps. I ask, would the size of the cores and the thickness of the wires remain the same or would the final power supplied change proportionally?

    ReplyDelete

emo-but-icon

Follow Us

Hot in week

Recent

Comments

Recommended Video

static_page